Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICFAI University, Raipur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 08:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

ICFAI University, Raipur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

ICFAI University, Raipur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable university, created directly in mainspace pre-ACPERM and pre-WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. I'm not finding any sources about the school from a search, and the article's always been badly-sourced, generally to the school's own website. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 07:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chhattisgarh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organization. No independent sources on the page with any significant coverage. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete– The only source is their own website, which is a dead link. Other searches show only trivial mentions. EmilyR34 (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete - There is no sufficient coverage. The current citation is primary. Drushrush (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.