Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nemont/Archive

Nemont

Nemont (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

06 January 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

• User143DOE (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Admitted to being a new account for User:Nemont and is copy pasting this confession many times on Talk:Neumont University. Lopsot (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• It is not a violation of the sockpuppetry policy if the user is open about the connection between the two accounts. NW (Talk) 15:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

---

30 April 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

• Lymani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Brand new user spent 10 minutes spamming his POV agreement in relation to on-going issues with Neumont University. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• And in what way does that make him a sock of Nemont (talk · contribs) or User143DOE (talk · contribs), who haven't edited in months? Amalthea 10:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Clerk declined - after no answer. Rschen7754 04:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Clerk note: Closed. This looks a whole lot like WP:COI rather than sockpuppet misuse. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

---

30 April 2013

Suspected sockpuppets

• Lymani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Berstabit (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 69.27.21.250 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User143DOE (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Brand new user spent 10 minutes spamming his POV agreement in relation to on-going issues with Neumont University. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

All these single purpose accounts are lobbying for the same purpose--to promote and spam NU article. They all've the same type of tone and each starts where the last one ended. None of these accounts edit at the same time. The guy behind these accounts is basically trying to show that he has the consensus of a lot of editors.--Userteen (talk) 17:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• And in what way does that make him a sock of Nemont (talk · contribs) or User143DOE (talk · contribs), who haven't edited in months? Amalthea 10:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
• CheckUser requested – Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention For the filer, who just dug this case out of the archive. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Clerk note: The filer, a sockpuppet of Mangoeater1000 (talk · contribs), has been blocked. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

---