teamreplica.com Teamreplica.com

   

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Teamreplica.com?

• 4.69E-5% of global Internet users visit Teamreplica.com

How many people visit Teamreplica.com each day?

• Teamreplica.com receives approximately 2.3K visitors and 12,248 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Teamreplica.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Teamreplica.com is mostly visited by people located in Korea, Republic of.

How much Teamreplica.com can earn?

• Teamreplica.com should earn about $7.35/day from advertising revenue.

What is Teamreplica.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Teamreplica.com is $7,114.69.

What IP addresses does Teamreplica.com resolve to?

• Teamreplica.com resolves to the IP addresses 18.160.181.88.

Where are Teamreplica.com servers located in?

• Teamreplica.com has servers located in United States.

teamreplica.com Profile

Description:해외클럽/국가대표 축구유니폼
Category:eCommerce and Shopping / Other eCommerce and Shopping
Edit Site Info

What technologies does teamreplica.com use?

These are the technologies used at teamreplica.com. teamreplica.com has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
CDN
Amazon Cloudfront Amazon Cloudfront
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services

teamreplica.com Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 2.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 12.2K pageviews. This equates to about 70.1K monthly visitors. Teamreplica.com traffic has increased by 45.13% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.3K
196.14%
Monthly Visits70.1K
45.13%
Pages per Visit5.30
88.2%
Visit duration01:32
436.76%
Bounce Rate58.86%
78.41%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,313
Monthly Visits:
70,084
Pages per Visit:
5.30
Daily Pageviews:
12,248
Avg. visit duration:
01:32
Bounce rate:
58.86%
Global Reach:
4.69E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
54,634
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
46,926
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
70,076
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
4,061,494
SimilarWeb Rank:
392,687
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
18.85%
Referral:
0.12%
Search:
81.03%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
29.66%
Mobile:
70.34%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

25.3K
DEC
48.3K
JAN
70.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Korea, Republic of 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to teamreplica.com?

Websites similar to teamreplica.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 1 hour ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 23 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with teamreplica.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3,220

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  teamreplica.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,061,494
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  10
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  74
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $7.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $220.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.7K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $7.1K.

How much would teamreplica.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$7.35
Monthly Revenue:
$220.50
Yearly Revenue:
$2,682.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Korea, Republic of 12,248$7.35

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.29
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$8.82
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$107.29
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
490
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
14,698
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
178,821

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Korea, Republic of 490$0.29

How much is teamreplica.com worth?

Website Value:
$7.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
teamreplica.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
teamreplica.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
teamreplica.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is teamreplica.com hosted? ▼

Teamreplica.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
18.160.181.88
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 18.160.181.88

How fast does teamreplica.com load? ▼

The average loading time of teamreplica.com is 545 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 95.
Average Load Time:
545 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)323ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 96% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)624ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)619ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)284ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)619ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)29ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)619ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)536ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)955ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)933ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)428ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)893ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)61ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)879ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 2.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 2.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 2.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Does teamreplica.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on teamreplica.com are reduced by 45%.
teamreplica.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 1.8 KB
Compressed size: 1012 B
File reduced by: 829 B (45%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SUSPICIOUS

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. teamreplica.com supports HTTPS.
 teamreplica.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: teamreplica.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Jan 31 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jan 30 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: Salford, Greater Manchester, GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Nov 2 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 teamreplica.com does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
location: http://www.teamreplica.com/
date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 14:29:42 GMT
pragma: no-cache
server: nginx
p3p: CP="NOI CURa ADMa DEVa TAIa OUR DELa BUS IND PHY ONL UNI COM NAV INT DEM PRE"
set-cookie: IMWEBVSSID=gmuoc6l1vocn2je7bnfjr42e0e31nunvmlblbvpq22v6f00tslh8f4c1rt9rqr2cb6c2t49821rcgn1bqoqi26at3chu2sifvs3ojt1; path=/; SameSite=None; Secure=true; domain=teamreplica.com; HttpOnly
set-cookie: al=KR; expires=Sat, 31-Jan-2026 14:29:42 GMT; Max-Age=25920000; path=/; domain=teamreplica.com; HttpOnly
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
x-cache: Miss from cloudfront
via: 1.1 af0464a03e5a11fc4127eac84696945c.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: MSP50-P2
x-amz-cf-id: dqDhUctMd7AiqSbM_W7FqohQvn3E9s_a9J2SgwjO_POofdrVyN6YAQ==

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 14:29:42 GMT
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Encoding: gzip
Server: nginx
Vary: Accept-Encoding
P3P: CP="NOI CURa ADMa DEVa TAIa OUR DELa BUS IND PHY ONL UNI COM NAV INT DEM PRE"
Set-Cookie: IMWEBVSSID=9c7qk8ei46ubn27hlkjnoidpj7d9uibnas0m2lru6m57dp6tq4otgmfbutjc88r7fsol0q8pb1hng2fv6b5ebj7sldo5rkq9f6duu53; path=/; domain=teamreplica.com; HttpOnly
Set-Cookie: al=KR; expires=Sat, 31-Jan-2026 14:29:42 GMT; Max-Age=25920000; path=/; domain=teamreplica.com; HttpOnly
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
X-Cache: Miss from cloudfront
Via: 1.1 c77aeab3024e2cd98690f252e49562ac.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
X-Amz-Cf-Pop: MSP50-P2
X-Amz-Cf-Id: IzwJGu4WFC0hi5B-UEPMUA0NZOUh2DAGaCa7cbv8sNbr_PGTd1j38g==

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 ip4:52.79.92.223 ~all 3600
SOA 86400
Mname ans1.hostcocoa.com
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 18.160.181.26 16
A 18.160.181.22 16
A 18.160.181.117 16
A 18.160.181.88 16
NS ans4.hostcocoa.com 172756
NS ans2.hostcocoa.com 172756
NS ans1.hostcocoa.com 172756
NS ans3.hostcocoa.com 172756

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 25, 2022 and will expire on December 25, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gabia, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on December 28, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-12-25
Domain Expires:
2026-12-25
Domain Updated:
2024-12-28
Domain Age:
2 years 3 months 12 days
Domain Registrar:
Gabia, Inc.
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: TEAMREPLICA.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 2746938549_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gabia.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.gabia.com
   Updated Date: 2024-12-28T06:15:15Z
   Creation Date: 2022-12-25T05:42:37Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2026-12-25T05:42:37Z
   Registrar: Gabia, Inc.
   Registrar IANA ID: 244
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +82.28293543
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Name Server: ANS1.HOSTCOCOA.COM
   Name Server: ANS2.HOSTCOCOA.COM
   Name Server: ANS3.HOSTCOCOA.COM
   Name Server: ANS4.HOSTCOCOA.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-04-06T14:30:06Z